I do have one question.
WHY ARE SO MANY THRILLERS ABOUT MASS-MURDERING RAPISTS.
Now--don't get me wrong. I like to see the good guys win. I as a general rule feel negatively towards killing people. So if the good guys have to win by killing people, yes, having the people they kill be mass-murdering rapists is ONE OF THE THINGS that would make me less conflicted and more satisfied at the outcome. ONE OF THE THINGS.
The good guys could also, for instance--Not kill the people. The people could realize how evil they are and feel horrible remorse. (That's another thing I like to see, is evil people realizing their evil. In Dragon Tattoo it's all lost in the horrible torture/violence that precedes their deaths.)
But the PROBLEMS with the almost total fixation of the suspense genre on mass-murdering rapists (and of course pharmaceutical companies taking advantage of the disadvantaged) are
- Really, really hopefully it represents a statistically improbable number of sexually-disordered serial killers
- It neglects the BULK of horrible evil in the world, which is NOT perpetrated by effete crazymen with upper class connections to protect them
- IT CANNOT BE GOOD FOR US.

3 comments: